January 20th, 2020
The Organising Committee of the 26th Annual British Skull Base Society Meeting 2020 have confirmed the conference programme. It promises to be an exciting and educational meeting with 3 keynote lectures from invited faculty and a wide range of submitted oral and poster presentations. The invited faculty are:
Sir David Calvert-Smith QC,
Former Director of Public Prosecutions for England and Wales and Retired High Court Judge, London
Professor Diego Mazzatenta,
Professor of Neurosurgery and Head of Pituitary Tumour and Skull Base Surgery,Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Italy
Professor Shaan Raza, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery,
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
BSBS 2020 Programme
January 25th, 2016
Richard J. Harvey, Mark Winder, Andrew Davidson, Tim Steel, Sunny Nalavenkata, Nadine Mrad, Ali Bokhari, Henry Barham, Anna Knisely (J Neurol Surg B 2015; 76(06): 464-470)
The return of olfaction and of sinonasal function are important end points after pituitary surgery. Differing outcomes on olfaction have been reported from transsphenoidal approaches. In general, patients prefer the endoscopic approach, and olfactory scores are better after the endoscopic route. The nasoseptal flap, in particular, to reconstruct the skull base as part of the overall process has been implicated in smell dysfunction. However, much of the literature on the impact of the nasoseptal flap comes from extended skull base surgery. Controversy exists as to the additional morbidity of utilizing such an approach. This study presents the sinonasal, smell, and objective olfactory outcomes of a standardized olfactory strip preserving nasoseptal flap technique utilized in the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to pituitary pathology.
January 22nd, 2016
John P. Leonetti, Sam J. Marzo, Douglas A. Anderson, Joshua M. Sappington (J Neurol Surg B 2015; 76(06): 416-420)
Facial paralysis has a profound functional, cosmetic, and psychological impact on affected patients. A variety of facial nerve grading systems have been described in the literature. The most commonly used grading method is the House-Brackmann grading scale that was adopted by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery in 1985. Other notable facial grading scales include the Sunnybrook, Yanagihara, Nottingham, and Sydney. The most commonly used facial nerve grading systems were designed to assess progressive neural recovery with an anatomically intact facial nerve. In their initial paper, House and Brackmann state that their facial nerve grading scale was intended to assess facial nerve recovery of an intact nerve. Patients who undergo surgical procedures for advanced lateral skull base tumors that require facial nerve and adjacent musculature resection and cases of long-standing facial nerve paralysis often require multiple static and mimetic procedures to optimize cosmetic result and return of long-term function. These can include the use of free muscle transfer, in conjunction with neural grafting, oculoplastic techniques, and static soft tissue tightening procedures. Existing facial recovery grading scales do not accurately assess this patient population. Individuals in this population are often automatically assigned a House-Brackmann score of 3 or 4. This void prevents clinicians from properly describing and communicating facial reanimation in this unique patient population.